Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Golden Age of the Feathered Serpent
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was deleted as apparent hoax. DS 05:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There is no such 'golden age' known or recognised by Mayanist scholarship- 1st C. AD would place this in the preclassic era, and there's nowhere near enough known about the details of this period to support any such claim. If not an actual hoax or piece of fiction, it is possible that this is some poor distillation of some LDS account somewhere speculating about this period/region. Even if so, it is better covered somewhere like Archaeology and the Book of Mormon, but I really don't see anything salvagable or sensible here. Delete, as unverified, not useful, and wrong. cjllw | TALK 04:58, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless verification (WP:V) can be shown.--blue520 05:55, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unsourced, unverified - could be original research, unless the author or other interested editor decides to state otherwise. (aeropagitica) (talk) 06:11, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, only 15 hits on Google, none are relevant (except for this article and places where it was copied). Fails WP:V. --Coredesat 07:26, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I found one reference to a Golden Age of the Toltecs, but nothing like the utopian period described. Looks like a hoax. Tychocat 09:56, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 04:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.