Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 April 30
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
April 30
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Images are paintings that were produced after 1981 (artist's birth) and are most likely copyright. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:06, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned image is 4 covers of the same book (different languages). Book covers are probably copyright. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:24, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 01:07, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Photogame1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Userspace image includes another image with unknown copyright, source, or license. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:27, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- On second note, it looks like Vincent Van Gogh self portrait: File:VanGogh 1887 Selbstbildnis.jpg. So image is most likely free.
But I do not know if the image needs to note the source file. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:30, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Kajol (3).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
.jpg&action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2012+April+30%23File%3AKajol+%283%29.jpg%5D%5D){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
- Copyright notice in image. Eeekster (talk) 02:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:13, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Southwestmostandups.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphaned logo, likely copyrighted. — ξxplicit 03:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Extremely pixelated, so this is likely a screenshot of an unidentified source. — ξxplicit 03:48, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per No Source. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:17, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Image is the cover of Professional Pilot Magazine. Most likely copyright -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 16:02, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 01:07, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PuertoRico-Pueblo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image is a logo for Pueblo Supermarkets. May be PD-Text, but font is very specific. Most likely not owned by uploader -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 16:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Why wouldn't it be PD-text? Eeekster (talk) 16:16, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
{{vk}}{{PD-textlogo}}{{trademarked}}, cf. File:NY Arrows logo.png & File:CarCreditCity.png. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:09, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Logo unlikely the property of the uploader Eeekster (talk) 16:13, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Recycling image.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphan image is found on many websites in various sizes from various dates. Unknown original source and image has a link to a specific company website. If uploader owned the work, why would they link to a corporate website? -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 16:18, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rihannasm.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Rihannaraining.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphan image is the cover of a Rihanna single and is probably copyright and not owned by uploader. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 16:24, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Todd.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Collection of odd images, some will be unfree (posters, record covers). Can't really decide if any are worth keeping. Ronhjones (Talk) 21:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bill Todd.jpg, now available under that name on Commons, was originally incorrectly uploaded by me to this file name. When I transferred it to Commons with the new name, I reverted File:Todd.jpg to the trading card version. I have no idea about the provenance or significance of that image or any of the others. Gildir (talk) 23:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:IMG 0632.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- 2D/3D artwork outside in USA. No FoP for modern artwork. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:46, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- There are two images in the history. 2D/3D artwork: delete unless proven to be out of copyright. Building: delete as no source and no licence. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.