Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Mishra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 01:03, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Mishra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion Only Highedit (talk) 16:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reinstate and protect: Prior to this edit, the page was about the Uttar Pradesh MLA and Minister of State, who clearly meets WP:POLITICIAN. It then became a crude amalgam of surviving material about the MLA overlaid with insubstantial stuff about a blogger. It has since been overwritten multiple times, sometimes by children boasting of their exam marks I suggest closing the AfD, reverting to the version at 01:13, 22 May 2016, and protecting the page against further incursions by the vain. AllyD (talk) 18:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 18:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Snow Keep: It is sad that an article was vandalised for more than a year no one noticed. While I was looking into page's history, I didn't find any good revision to restore. Even when it was about M.L.A Mishra, it didn't adhere to NPOV (stunning vicotry ). Replaced all contents with 2-sentence stub. It should be snow kept because subject is an elected politician (WP:NPOL). Anup [Talk] 21:51, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: I didn't look at article's history but judging from its current state, it doesn't look promotional. Current subject is an Indian MLA and they are notable per WP:NPOL. Pratyush (talk) 08:43, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Whatever the past flaws of the article, the current one is on a person who clearly meets the criteria for articles on politicians. Especially since Uttar Pradesh, where he serves as a member of the legislative assembly, has almsot 200,000 people, thus more than most countries.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:27, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.