Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pet Supplies "Plus"
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. just enough consensus on notability JForget 13:54, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Pet Supplies "Plus" (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. Non-notable company. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:11, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article says the chain has over 200 stores. According to the website it is a 30 year old franchise. Onefinalstep (talk) 23:36, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think that makes it notable for a WP article. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:06, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's hard to figure why such a large (according to them) chain has zero independent sourcing, but that seems to be the case. Nothing online except their own website and related items. Nothing in GNews except an occasional local announcement about the opening of an individual store. I could not even find out if they are privately held or publicly traded. There's just nothing significant out there about them that I could find. So, non-notable. --MelanieN (talk) 02:31, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
keep - onefinalstep is correct. qö₮$@37 (talk) 00:41, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I added a couple refs (Business Week and Crains). Hoover's, in its US Pet Store Industry Overview, says "Major companies include PetSmart, PETCO Animal Supplies Stores, Pet Supplies "Plus," and Petland." [1]. Novickas (talk) 00:37, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep: Seems to be notable, passes WP:RS. Sego Lily (talk) 02:33, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.