CUM ON YOUR AI SLUT

Sophia Blake

B

BeMoreMilo

Well-Known Member
RikFlashheart said:
As much as I like the look of the girl. She was awful follow for me. Asking silly prices for the simplest things. She also got in with a group of girls. All former page 3 girls. Then the account became like a robot. So no for me she was rubbish. I see the stuff here and think one more time. Then look at the msgs I’ve had from her and think nah
Click to expand...

Thanks for the review, appreciate it. It’s a shame because she’s a gorgeous girl
 
Shir Shean

Shir Shean

Well-Known Member
BeMoreMilo said:
Thanks for the review, appreciate it. It’s a shame because she’s a gorgeous girl
Click to expand...
She has followed the usual format for OnlyFans etc. She used to show quite a bit then put it all behind paywalls and the prices kept creeping up. If you ask me, she has got fat and lazy off the idiots that pay for her overpriced shit. Look at the number of videos now where she doesn't show her face...another really annoying creator habit.
 
S

Stuarts1

Well-Known Member
RikFlashheart said:
As much as I like the look of the girl. She was awful follow for me. Asking silly prices for the simplest things. She also got in with a group of girls. All former page 3 girls. Then the account became like a robot. So no for me she was rubbish. I see the stuff here and think one more time. Then look at the msgs I’ve had from her and think nah
Click to expand...
Ditto this and the post above.

Account is managed by someone on her behalf. Not worth a sub.
 
H

HumptyDumpty123456

Active Member
Fanpack said:
Did anyone find the BG content she made? surely out there somewhere
Click to expand...
You mean on Telegram, it was insinuated, but never buy anything that doesn't say clearly what is behind the paywall.

She used to be pretty decent but its obvious now its click bait systems to get you to pay on the hope,,, its something akin to what is suggested.

Seen others say this: if they made it so they had to give refunds for false advertising, which includes not being upfront what you are paying for, OF would be bankrupt. And so would most of its "creators".
 
S

Stuarts1

Well-Known Member
HumptyDumpty123456 said:
You mean on Telegram, it was insinuated, but never buy anything that doesn't say clearly what is behind the paywall.

She used to be pretty decent but its obvious now its click bait systems to get you to pay on the hope,,, its something akin to what is suggested.

Seen others say this: if they made it so they had to give refunds for false advertising, which includes not being upfront what you are paying for, OF would be bankrupt. And so would most of its "creators".
Click to expand...
I've got refunded for badly misleading stuff, I threatened chargebacks (not for the model being discussed here). What does the T&Cs say for content creators - there must be stuff in there about selling misleading content. Just quote that at them.

Her only "bg" I am aware of is her in a shower with another male content creator which just has a minor bit of groping, and then her vr stuff which was shot for a vr site (stripzvr???) where its a pov lapdance and she gets groped (nothing too explicit).

She has just said that she has shot gg content, is this full gg or more of this lipstick lesbian "insta friendly" stuff, where the most you get is topless?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
crapper Sophia E Erotic / Porn / XXX 0
M OnlyFans Sophiaraine OnlyFans 0
crapper Sophia Thatcher Celebrity Sexy Photos 0
S OnlyFans Lia-Sophia OnlyFans 0
B OnlyFans Sophia Blake/SophiasSelfies OnlyFans 2
Similar threads
Sophia E
OnlyFans Sophiaraine
Sophia Thatcher
OnlyFans Lia-Sophia
OnlyFans Sophia Blake/SophiasSelfies
Top